Monday, November 26, 2012

Employment Generation Program of Andhra Pradesh

Its been around four months approximately since we have started work as PMRDF's. Have been thinking of blogging for the past few months, but never got to doing it. Better late than never, here comes my first post.

In this blog entry I am planning to talk about the employment generation program of the state of Andhra Pradesh. Just to give a bit of background, We PMRDF's in Andhra pradesh have a mandate of evaluating one government scheme every month. so last month we fellows chose " Rajiv Yuva Kiranalu" which is the employment generation program of AP. This scheme was conceived to build job specific skills among unemployed youth and place them in appropriate jobs. It has set a target of providing employment for 15 lakh youth. This is to be acheived on a mission mode. 

The scheme is implemented in a  public private partnerhip model. Government signs MOU with training partners who are responsible for the training and placement of the candidates and are in turn paid by the govt. for these services. But the innovation here is in the design of the payment system. The training partners are paid in stages. First 25 % when the batch starts, second 40 % when placements are done, the next 25 % if the candidate stays on in the job for 3 months and the last 10 % if the candidate stays on in the job for an year. So there is an incentive for the training partner not only to provide a job but also provide such a job which can retain the candidates in the job. 

Now as a part of my study I looked at candidates who got trained and placed majorly in the tribal areas of ITDA Rampachodavaram( which has around 7 blocks) which is where I am working. The official stats from the website state that from ITDA Rampachodavaram around 852 were trained of which 682 candidates were placed. Allmost all of these jobs are in urban areas. Hyderabad alone accounts for around 50 % percent of these 682 jobs. So, I took a certain sample( around 50 candidates) of candidates and tried to find out the present staus of their job. 

When I met with these candidates I realized that the drop out rate of these candidates was around 80 %. So, basically candidates even after getting a job offer were not continuing in their jobs.  Next step was to find out why they were dropping out. Some of the main reasons for the candidates dropping out were less salary, food & accomodation issues in the urban areas, not wanting to stay away from home, further studies, too much work,marriage etc... Of the above reasons low salary was the major of all. offcial stats show that around 75 % of the candidates earn less than Rs.6000. In some cases this salary has a food and accomodation component which further reduces the in hand salary that the candidate receives. Also if you look at the payments made to the training partners, many of the training partners do not even claim the last 35 % ( it was 25 % last year) which is paid if they retain the candidates. That means there are running their operations with 65 or 75 % of money they are supposed to receive. So they will have to reduce their costs to break even which will impact the quality of training. 

Why are so many candidates dropping out? First of all majority of people always prefer to work some where near their home. They will only leave to work in distant areas away from their homes only if they think they are able to earn considerably more than they can near their home town's. In the present case of the above scheme most of the jobs are low paying jobs and this coupled with the high costs in urban areas where these jobs are located does not leave the candidates with any savings. Even when they take up the job, they have to compromise a lot on their food and accomodation to be able to save some money. Some others come back to continue their futher education and in case of girls, marriage is another big reason for drop out.

So what should be done? of course the ideal scenario is when we can creare rural employment so that the candidates can stay near their homes and work. Also since rural areas have low costs of living, even low salaries might result in savings. But the problem here is our rural economies are not so vibrant to create many job opportunities unlike urban economies. So, urban employment still holds the key to create employment in huge numbers. For a job in urban environment to be sustainable the salaries have to increase. One of the recommendations we made was to change the payment system to incentivize the training partners to get candidates better paying jobs. So in the present 4 step payment process, 40 % is paid in the second stage when placements are done. We can increase this amount to say 60 % if the salary is above say Rs.7500 and say 70 % if the salary is above say Rs.9000 etc... So we are saying there will be variable pay in the second stage based on how high the salary is. This should act as an incentive for the training partner to provide better paying jobs. Also at the same time continuing efforts should be made to promote rural employment. We should also try to look at those urban jobs that can be shifted to rural areas like rural BPO's, rural tourism etc...

My idea of writing this blog is to share my work with other fellows working in other districts and at the same with everybody interested in development. I also think this way it will act as a platform for discussions. So please go ahead and post your comments and criticism's on the above.


PS: Not proof read, so pardon me for any mistakes.

10 comments:

  1. hi,

    great job there and a great description .It will surely help the fellows by guiding them when they start on similar projects . however , i would like to ask few questions. please take some time to reply(may be here or mail me).
    1. once you selected your sample of 50 beneficiaries , how did you approach them (on phone ,personal meeting etc.,)
    2. Also on what basis did you select them ?(geography,social status etc.,)
    3. Did you touch upon the point of 'horizon widening ' ,when you interacted with these people . (like most of us think when moving out to cities)
    4. If you had submitted any report of sorts on the matter and can you share the same ?(would love it)

    Do reply.

    best regards,
    Phani kiran,
    PMRDF -ganjam.
    sp.phanikiran@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Ramesh

    Some of ur suggestion is good to improve the quality of training to the youth by the training partners.

    In following points I am giving some suggestion or ideas in the field of placement linked skill development training. I am writing some the points from my own experience because I was the state Co-ordinator for the state of West Bengal & Tripura in my last job profile under MoRD SGSY scheme.

    1. Providing skill development training to rural youth out of which majority are school drop out (mostly below 10th standard.) It is very tough for any training partner to place these boys/girls with a salary more than 7-8K with this type of short term training. In a time when a technical graduate is not able to get a salary around 13-15K in metro cities. But to reduce the dropout we need to strengthen the mobilization process. Many a time the training partner is not doing it properly. They just enrolling the candidates without proper sensitization & to achieve their target.
    Hence we have to give more emphasis on these process and should select more deserving candidates.

    (2)In regard to ur point on quality of food & accommodation provided to these candidates. We need convergence between different department. The major recruiters are the manufacturing industries with huge manpower. Because of lack of co-ordination between the department imparting the training and the labor department. The labour department is not showing that much keen interest to look into the facility provided to placed candidates in their respective industries. The quality of facility provided to these boys/girls are deteriorating day by day.

    3. Your opinion on rural job. I want to mention here that the respective state govt. should give some incentive to private players to open up there industries in the areas where there are larger unemployment.

    Above are some of my personal opinions.

    With Regards

    Alok Kumar Mahapatra
    PMRDF- Sambalpur (Odisha)
    alokmahapatra@ymail.com
    M-08895102520

    ReplyDelete
  3. > But the problem here is our rural economies are not so vibrant to create > many job opportunities unlike urban economies

    Ramesh, I have two thoughts around this.

    A. Is the training we provide to rural youth, relevant to rural economies?

    Let me elaborate. There are several basic needs in rural economies which are unsolved, e.g. education, transportation, medicine or getting technology into primary sector (agriculture). Are we training our youth to solve these? Where is the gap? What can we fix?

    The best solution, IMHO, seems like to train folks to be entrepreneurs. Our primary sector (agro) is still mostly rural driven; can these budding entrepreneurs make the secondary sector (manufacturing) to be rural driven?

    B. Are we providing enough opportunities in the system itself?

    One obstacle I see: our entry bars to allow someone to solve a problem is very high. Let me pick education as an example.

    Our system forces someone to be a Bachelors in Education to teach a Class 1-2 kid. Why can't a class 10th drop out teach a class 1-2 kid how to read/write? (not saying competency is irrelevant, he may not be able to teach a Class 8-10 kid). In my limited experience, have seen class 5 kids struggling to read/write (our condition is not so good, and yet we put in restrictions :(). Now the irony is - if I am a B.Ed., why would I stay in village and teach? So end of the day, restrictions hit us back, and we claim we don't have enough teachers!

    Thanks for the post. Wish you a great blogging spree :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. hello reddy, great stuff man !! Must appreciate the efforts you are putting in. However, I feel the model on the whole is unsustainable. 1) Your incentive scheme is encouraging movement to lowly paid city jobs whose value in a city market is low. Adjusting for inflation these jobs would only be done "because there is nothing else to do" and remain unsustainable and low paying, essentially adding to the urban slum 2) The skills imparted are 'not so marketable' in a rural context and people have to give them up forever because the person cannot do the job in his village/town ( + girls after marriage )........ Instead of this you could look at avenues for imparting skills which can help them generate wealth in a rural context. It could be any manufacturing or service or entrepreneurship which in the long run will also help in making the rural economy more vibrant..... Hope this helps !!! :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ok let me get to answer some of the questions to the best of my ability:
    Phani: I first tried to meet the candidates personally, if they migrated to some other area, then I spoke to them on phone. Also I am working in tribal areas. So most of the candidates I interviewed were tribal and geographical area was ITDA Rampachodavaram. I do not understand what u mean by horizon widening? please explain more and ya I will send u my report though i feel its not written really well. thanks for ur comment.

    Alok : Can u explaing more how mobilization affects dropout rate? with respect to ur point on food & acco,since this is a PPP model,weather candidates get acco or not is dependent on the contract between training partner and placement provider. Govt. to reduce this problem has made a list of all hostels in major cities and has employed people who can help you find accommodation. With respect to your third point,yes they should encourage rural employment but how is question they do not seem to have an answer to. Thanks.

    APM: Hello APM ( you should left a clue as to what ur name is :)). First to answer your question a bit of background as to what I think. I think there is three avenues for employment: private, government and self employment. Now the scheme above is majorly dealing with private employment. The sectors u spoke of like education, transportation, health do majorly come under government employment.I think govt. alone cannot generate employment in huge numbers. Yes self employment is another solution,again here can it create jobs on the scale that private employment creates. I am not sure of that. regarding your second point saying do we have high barriers : For the specific example of education that you took, I guess you are making the point that we are keeping these high restrictions even though we dont have supply of B.Eds. I dont think so I guess there are lot of B.Eds willing take up a teaching jobs even in rural areas. I think education suffers because of lack of quality of teachers which will surely get affected if u reduce their elgibility criteria to tenth standard. A example I see in my state was during N T Rama Rao's time he reduced the eligibity criteria for tribal teachers to 10th standard. As you urself said a 5th class student cannot read or write,even the 10th class student's quality is also going to be poor. How can he do justice by becoming a teacher?

    Pushpendu: Thanks dude. true dude the whole scheme is useless if there are no urban jobs that are not lowly paid. But I feel there are many people who are willing to take up urban jobs if they can generate a savings of 3000-4000 and I feel there are jobs that can generate such kinds of savings. I guess the trick is find those sectors and target them. Second with respect to rural environment, the problem here is I cant think of many ways to generate wealth in rural context.manufacturing or service industries people will prefer to setup generally in urban areas except for if there are minerals etc... and self employment is an option but can it generate as many jobs as private employment. I am not sure

    If you think some of the arguments made above do not make sense, please post it so that we can discuss. After all I am quite new to this sector

    ReplyDelete
  6. by 'horizon widening' i mean , people once they move out to cities start gaining (or atleast try to get) new skills and improve their chances of moving to a better paying jobs . did any of the youth showed an interest in learning any new skills to make him earn more in the cities .

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nice discussions :)
    I guess the problems discussed are very deep rooted. It is great to see everyone's focus on Education, 'coz I believe it is one hell of a game changer. If we can just ensure that we impart quality education, we will empower our future generations to take care of themselves (having said this, I know implementing this on the ground is a real big challenge)
    APM - the entire criteria for holding such high standards is that the kids have access to best teachers. Unfotunately, the letter of the law prevails & the spirit has been completely ignored. This might be because we do not see teaching as a lucrative enough career option & for those, who teach do it more out of "NO CHOICE" (atleast for a vast majority). Also, there is a huge paucity of high quality teacher training programs, which is another pre-requisite for providing quality education.
    Phani - As far as the horizon widening thing is concerned, I think education will be a great empowerment :)
    Alok - I know this might sound idealistic but again if can provide quality education, we can definitely get them jobs much more than 8-10K. There needs to be supervision on quality but there is an important component we might have missed on. People who are undergoing these training programs need to be motivated & should constantly strive harder. I know lack of education/exposure might be an hindrance. This reflects in your point as well - when you say engineers can't get a decent job, its again the quality that should bother. Engineering is often taken as a career option to mint high salaries & seldom for the interest of it. This mentality has led to several engineering institutions that provide a degree for the namesake.
    Pushpendu - You looked at the scheme in a great way, but I think I will differ that there is no market. As cities move towards concrete jungles, there is an increased demand of labour in the un-organized sector. It is upon us to supply the manpower in the desired fashion. Also, looking at creating rural opportunities through re-structuing these training programs.

    It is just great to see these discussions happening. Really encouraging :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ramesh, Mayank - thanks for your replies. Nice discussion.

    Re education, the point I wanted to make: the delta in output that additional teacher qualifications can provide (beyond a certain minimum level) may not be very high for a given standard. For instance, say you/me teach English alphabets to a class I student and a phd/postdoc guy teach the same, there may not be a lot of difference in the way the student will learn. Of course, there will be significant difference if we move beyond primary/secondary education :)

    Lowering the entry bar can create good results if supervised appropriately (imho), e.g. we have it all over the western countries (and in some our engg. colleges too); the Teaching Assistants (TAs) start small, usually evaluating papers, helping with assignments and in couple of months they teach 1st year classes. Experience in teaching provides for the lack of a professional teaching degree.

    It need not be govt. based too. A nice example: http://www.vidyarambam.org/about-us.html. They train rural girls (who are qualified but are unable to take jobs in towns due to family constraints, conservative social norms etc.) to teach/supplement education of kids in their own village (I am unable to find online reference to their process, but personally I have talked to the founder, an amazingly dynamic senior gentleman).

    Similarly each community/village could choose their own teachers (from amongst their individuals) for their kids.

    Mayank, I agree with you on the interest part. Unfortunately our systems are based on score cards/degrees/norms, there is no metric to measure passion :( I appreciate the process TFI follows to recruit youth for education (you would know much more than me, I believe you have been with them). Hope we could emulate that in our system.

    Would love to hear your opinion.

    Off topic: Reddy, Mayank, Alok, Phani and everybody, I also wanted to pick your brain little bit on technology. Based on your experience as PMRDF so far, do you see areas where IT/CS/Computers can make a difference? Can it dramatically improve any life process in our rural areas?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dude APM, first of all tell us all ur name? identify uself ?

    ReplyDelete
  10. @APM : Im actually working on a grievance redressal system for NREGS based on an IVR system . Cant tell much about it right now . but will surely share with you guys(i presume) once it reaches a logical
    conclusion.
    @ R^3 : just observed it . it should be pmrdf DIARIES :P . You should also be least bothered about APM's identity . 'Anonymous' followers add to the beauty of the blog, by giving honest opinions :) .

    ReplyDelete